|
Pupil: - <<It's
grandiose... still it's relatively close to us,
since we'll have to use it in the coming years...
So, we should really learn how to use
maths.
N: - Grandiose and relatively
close?
P: - Oh, yes, at the
beginning, when I was 13, to me it seemed......it
was really big.
N: - How big?
P: - It belonged to another
world, a really vast one. You know, there were
maths for this and maths for that. There was
algebra, and geometry. It all seemed really big to
me, so you had to take maths from a little parcel
of this vastness. So you couldn't take everything,
it scared me a bit, by the way.
N: - Why did it scare
you?
P: - Because it was like
that, it sort of made my head swim, I had never
touched that, and now, you had to pick and gather
maths, so you could not gather it all, we couldn't
pick everything all at once.
N : - Like what? If you wanted
to make a comparison....
P : - It's like a field of
prunes....well.... prunes that you beat down, you
know? They fall and then you have to gather them.
And then, there's an impending storm, and then you
have to pick them in a hurry, but you can't gather
them all, and you try to take the biggest, but it's
quite difficult.
N: - Because there is an
impending storm?
P: - Yes, there is the
storm.
N: - But what is that
storm?
P: - The storm...it's French,
it's time, it's the other subjects.
N: - All the things that bother
you?
P: - Yes, if you only had
maths to learn, you could do a good job. Yes, you
could dedicate yourself entirely to this subject
and then it would be all
right.>>
|
This pupil's
speech expresses fantasies which she
projects onto mathematics. Those fantasies
appear through metaphors: a field
of plums which are attractive since they
are beaten down, a storm which is
frightening. It is all expressed through a
scenario which, in a way, gives a very
positive image of maths: grandiose, to
dedicate oneself entirely to maths.....Yet
she fails in that subject (the
storm?.....) Something bothers her. Her
picture of maths is ambivalent.
The
cognitive
and emotional
interaction
here
appears in the
metaphors she uses ( field of plums, storm
).
Metaphor is like a
third party between the cognitive and the
emotional aspects, in that it creates a
link beween them, and yet they do not
merge totally into one another.
Thus, it
permits an interaction without any
fusion.
|
|